I just finished reading a couple
books relating to the Arizona Dept of Corrections. The first was "Wilderness and Razor Wire"
by Ken Lamberton. He was a teacher in
Tucson who was arrested for a sex crime that landed him in prison for 12
years. The second was "Crossing The
Yard" by Richard Shelton, who served as a volunteer teaching creative
writing workshops in the Arizona prison system for some 30 years. Ironically, Lamberton was one of his students. So obviously, I did some reflecting on the
similarities and differences to my own situation and also pondered their
thoughts and observations.
I'll start with Lamberton. Obviously, the whole situation is similar to
my own. His crime was also heavily
publicized by the media, and he's gone through many similar experiences as
an" ex teacher sex offender." Like myself, he has a strong connection
to nature, and much of this book is about plants and animals he observed in his
Tucson prison yard. Obviously, we both
have a strong desire to write as an "escape" from confinement.
Lamberton also has a similar
outlook on prison to my own. He writes
about " easy time" vs " hard time". Easy time is retreating from emotions and
connections as well as ignoring or resisting one's personal responsibility for
one's actions. Hard time is staring it
straight in the face and not blaming others, or the state, as many tend to
do. I acknowledge my tendency to do that
at times, though I am questioning policies and attitudes of the system, rather
than it being the state's fault that I'm here.
Lamberton and Shelton both share my sentiments on the nonexistent notion
of correction or rehabilitation.
Lamberton writes: "It is the
difference between discipline and punishment: one looks forward and works
toward restoration and health, the other looks backward and tears down,
dehumanizes, destroys." It's clear to us both which method the ADC
subscribes to.
Shelton, as an observer outside of
confinement, had this to say: "it made me increasingly aware of how little
the department of corrections cared about programs, rehabilitation, or any of
the other fine phrases that were still part of their public rhetoric... I was reminded, if I hadn't learned the
lesson earlier at Florence, that as far
as the department of corrections was concerned, volunteers were shit and
educational programs, even those bring their own funding and making the prison
look good, were of no importance. The fewer
of them the better."
There are also some big differences
between Lamberton's situation and my own.
He had an affair with a 14 year old student, in fact they ran away
together. I never acted on my
inappropriate attractions, other than to download pictures. Another difference, very painful to me, is
that not only did his wife not turn him into the police (he was identified by
an acquaintance in Colorado), she stayed with him and studied law and worked
with the lawyers to get him out after eight years. She ended up getting hired as a paralegal
with the firm she was working with.
Incredibly though, after 18 months
of being out, the Arizona Court of Appeals reversed the lower court's decision
and he had to return to prison for four more years.
Then, there are situational
differences that clearly illustrate the direction of the ADC. Lamberton wrote about the inmate park and a
visitor park, both full of plants and the occasional wildlife. He caught toads with his kids in
visitation. He wrote about sitting under
a tree, playing his guitar, and the 75 pound packages of food that were sent to
inmates by their families at holiday time.
There is nothing like this in my incarceration. I was envious of his "posh"
situation.
Then later in the book, as time
passes, the trees, plants, and flowers get torn up and the "Parks"
get shut down. The Food Care packages
are prohibited, and eventually all sex offenders are declared to be a predatory
security threat and cannot go "below" medium security yards.
For a short time he was in my
complex, but managed, with the help of his wife, to get shipped back to Tucson,
an option no longer available to sex offenders.
I think it might even be worse to
have those privileges and lose them, though that DOC continues to chip away at
the few privileges that remain. The all
day "food visits" were recently limited to 4 hours. The list of "acceptable" books and
magazines are shrinking exponentially and lock downs and strip searches are
more numerous and more thorough.
I realize, of course, there's no
purpose in comparing my situation to anyone else's. Each is unique. Lamberton's wife is certainly not Jess. That I think my actions were far less
directed toward her or anyone is irrelevant.
Did I hurt her any less? My
situation is my own, and it matters little what I believe about it.
I do get some satisfaction in
knowing that both Lamberton and Shelton have made similar observations to my
own. Especially as Shelton was not an
inmate, it adds a bit more credibility to my own sentiments that he is not
merely whining about his own predicament.
Shelton ends his book with some powerful ideas and suggestions toward
the prison system as an entity.
" Over the years, I have grown
old while the system spins more and more rapidly out of control, an industry
that depends for its energy on the processing of living bodies." He dryly
quips about how the "product" of the penal system is a rare
recyclable product, and that true treatment programs would reduce the
recyclable nature of the product, which is not in the interest of the industry.
He notes, and I wholeheartedly
concur, that a fraction of the number of inmates could and should be
incarcerated - but in a secure mental hospital, as there are those who are
criminally insane and dangerous to society.
But that the majority are neither.
Shelton advocates for people to
step up and volunteer at local prisons, to see the real story behind the walls
and fences. Though the institution will
resist any attempts at transparency, nevertheless, it's promising to read
intelligent published literature on this topic; I thought I'd better grab these
books before they are banned as well.
I encourage you to read them and
other resources that are based on direct observation or objective data as
opposed to media sensationalism or fear mongering political agendas. Someday, that could be you or someone you
love.
No comments:
Post a Comment