The "top story" on July
14th was about the problem of homeless registered sex-offenders.
There are some 239 registered sex-offenders in Phoenix without a residential
address, so they are required to be at a specific street corner for certain
hours each day. Apparently this is not
tracked all that well by the authorities.
The story cites the problems that
have developed because of this system and lack of oversight, specifically naming
two offenders who committed particularly heinous crimes toward young children. One of these homeless sex offenders raped a
young child in 2007. In addition, the
reporter interviewed a family that lives near one of the intersections assigned
to a homeless sex offender. Needless to say, they were quite unhappy about the
entire system.
This story omitted many significant
facts that would have presented a more thorough and balanced picture of the
situation. Instead, it focused on the most egregious examples of violent crimes
and abuse. A more objective presentation of the story might have gone like
this:
There are 239 registered sex-offenders in
Phoenix who are homeless - unable to secure a permanent residence. Housing options are limited for registered
sex offenders, in that they can be denied housing at some homeless shelters or can
be denied approval to live with family members or friends, even if their crime
did not involve violence or sexual contact with a minor, as is the case for
over 200 of the 239 listed. These non-violent, non-contact homeless offenders
must abide by the same restrictions applied to violent offenders, though their
compliance is not regularly monitored.
In spite of the difficulties of securing
housing and employment, and the widespread discrimination against this segment
of the population, there have been no serious incidents for over seven years. Research
by the Department of Justice and other sources has shown that only 3% of sex-offenders
are likely to re-offend - far fewer than any other class of felon except murderers,
who are rarely released at all.
This approach to the story might
elicit a more humane, realistic, and constructive debate about what is most
certainly a significant issue. Biased, unrealistic reporting does nothing to further
a discussion of solutions.
Some sex offenders are dangerous
predators, and society truly needs protection from them. All sex-offenders,
however, do not belong in that same category. Many registered sex offenders are
non-violent, non-contact offenders (having been convicted for possession of
pornography, for example) who have made mistakes and are committed to atoning
for those mistakes and to rebuilding their lives. An objective media portrayal of
their struggles and a restorative (rather than retributive) justice approach to
their reparations would do much to alleviate the homeless problem for the
offenders, their families, the victims, and the whole of society.
No comments:
Post a Comment